Illustrated TCP/IP
by Matthew G. Naugle Wiley Computer Publishing, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 0471196568 Pub Date: 11/01/98 |
Previous | Table of Contents | Next |
When reading through the following sections on the OSPF protocol, keep one main goal in mind: network design. OSPF allows us to build very efficient networks through segmenting of an autonomous system into small groups called areas, variable-length subnet masks, Type of Service routing, and a host of other betterments compared to the RIP protocol. It was mentioned at the beginning of this section that there are two types of routing methods: IGP and EGP. The table compares RIP with OSPF.
Function/Feature | RIPv1 | RIPv2 | OSPF |
---|---|---|---|
Standard number | RFC 1058 | RFC 1723 | RFC 2178 |
Link-state protocol | No | No | Yes |
Large range of metrics | Hop count (16=Infinity) | Hop count (16=Infinity) | Yes, based on 165535 |
Update policy | Route table every 30 seconds | Route table every 30 seconds | Link-state changes, or every 30 seconds |
Update address | Broadcast | Broadcast, multicast | Multicast |
Dead interval | 300 seconds total | 300 seconds total | 300 seconds total, but usually much less |
Supports authentication | No | Yes | Yes |
Convergence time | Variable (based on number of routers × dead interval) | Variable (based on number of routers × dead interval) | Media delay + dead interval |
Variable-length subnets | No | Yes | Yes |
Supports supernetting | No | Yes | Yes |
Type of Service (TOS) | No | No | Yes |
Multipath routing | No | No | Yes |
Network diameter | 15 hops | 15 hops | 65535 possible |
Easy to use | Yes | Yes | No |
A Routing Protocol Comparison
|
Previous | Table of Contents | Next |